From owner-marxism-international  Mon Apr 14 18:10:31 1997
Message-Id: <l03020900af785245e2a4@[130.244.121.1]>
In-Reply-To: 
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:12:36 +0100
From: Hugh Rodwell <m-14970@mailbox.swipnet.se>
Subject: M-I: Re: the alea (or is that ale, aah..?)

Stephen T

pp The Revulsionary Marxist Collective Buffalo/SUNY

writes:


>... There is, of course, only one
>Marx whose work is not so much a subject of mutations, the alea or
>epistemological breaks but historical continuity ("necessity"): the
>changes in Marx's work are most effectively explained by dialectical
>transformations.


So explain!

Cheers,

Hugh


PS Don't you love "the alea" -- nice touch of Lacan, there, "the hoi
tytoity" -- just like Yoshie said: not CLASS, but CLASSY. Once Stevo starts
putting those presumptuous and strutting little "the"s in front of *Greek*
words instead of just Latin, he'll have left the nursery and can play with
the big boys. Who knows, he might even have a movement of his own (and I'm
not talking about relieving constipation...). It really is a matter of the
erythron ex akrou pachy, as I'm sure Russell will corroborate.





     --- from list marxism-international@lists.village.virginia.edu ---