From m-14970@mailbox.swipnet.se  Mon Apr 14 23:41:52 1997
From: m-14970@mailbox.swipnet.se (Hugh Rodwell)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:41:52 +0100
Subject: M-TH: Re: the alea (or is that ale, aah..?)
Message-ID: <l03020900af786306744d@[130.244.78.29]>

Stephen T

pp The Revulsionary Marxist Collective Buffalo/SUNY

writes:


>... There is, of course, only one
>Marx whose work is not so much a subject of mutations, the alea or
>epistemological breaks but historical continuity ("necessity"): the
>changes in Marx's work are most effectively explained by dialectical
>transformations.


So explain!

Cheers,

Hugh


PS Don't you love "the alea" -- nice touch of Lacan, there, "the hoi
tytoity" -- just like Yoshie said: not CLASS, but CLASSY. Once Stevo starts
putting those presumptuous and strutting little "the"s in front of *Greek*
words instead of just Latin, he'll have left the nursery and can play with
the big boys. Who knows, he might even have a movement of his own (and I'm
not talking about relieving constipation...). It really is a matter of the
erythron ex akrou pachy, as I'm sure Russell will corroborate.





     --- from list marxism-thaxis@lists.village.virginia.edu ---