Malecki wrote: “Can anybody give a reliable description of
what this woman [Ebert] really stands for by the way?"
If there was any need for proof of the fascist anti-intellectual
practices of Malecki, as usual, in his
confusion he provides one here. Having ranted and raved about
Ebert's book for two or three long posts,
having advised people to
tear the book apart and wipe their ass with it, now he asks
someone to
provide a “reliable” account of the book
for him! Not only has he not read the very book that he already
has condemned to ass-wiping, he CANNOT EVEN READ: he is
begging someone to READ IT FOR HIM and give him a synopsis so that
he can then use that summary to re-confirm his own views! By his
own definition then, Malecki is a fascist: like them he does not
read books....
HERE is a radical man ready to lead you into the future!
II.
Christi-Ann wrote: " . . . It's also indicative of
sexism and objectification (if there is such a word), where people
are not whole beings but collections of objects, just waiting to
be used. It's easier to attack someone if you think of them as a
group of genitalia than as an individual who is capable of
intelligent, rational thought (no matter how much we might
disagree on the contents of such thoughts).
On the flip side, I do admit that it was damn funny." Christi-Ann
performs the usual liberal ritual of denouncing and distancing
herself from the macho, the sexism, and the outright violence
which has been unleashed upon us from the very beginning (all
under the guise of “response") and then — in a double
move — taking back all her objections by confirming all that
she has questioned: “It is damn funny. . ." Funny
indeed!
As far as women on this list are concerned: we are a collective of
men and women, white and persons of color, “American”
and non-American...it
is symptomatic of the formulaic
“readings” that take place on the list that unless
names are tagged, people have no “clue”...
from list
marxism-international@lists.village.virginia.edu