MIM Notes ***

MIM Notes 282 · May 15, 2003 · Page 1

MIM Notes

May 15, 2003, Nº 282

The Official Newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM)

Free

INSIDE: Dixie Chicks * Gaza * Under Lock & Key * Una Página en Español...

MIM
PO Box 29670
Los Angeles, CA 90029
Return Service Requested

PRESORTED STANDARD

U.S. POSTAGE PAID

PERMIT #56365

BOSTON, MA

On the web: www.etext.info/Politics/MIM

You are not on a mailing list. You will not receive this paper again unless you take action.

he United $tates and its partners
the European Union, United
Nations and Russia presented

I$raeli and Palestinian leaders a "road
map to peace" on April 30. According to
hype, this is a new plan that will demand
equal concessions from both I$raelis and
Palestinians. In fact, the "road map"
rehashes earlier failed proposals. In
particular, it demands the Palestinians
renounce armed struggle unconditionally,
ignoring the basic reality that I$rael's
settlements make it the aggressor--and
aggressor with massive military
superiority.

Some neo-conservatives and Zionists

believe the "road map" is different
because the geopolitical situation has
changed. The recent Iraq war showed
the world that resistance to the United
$tates is futile, they argue. Oppressed
peoples like the Palestinians should just
suck it up and accept whatever crumbs
Uncle $am wants to give them. Such
arguments reveal what kind of "peace"
these war-mongers want--secure
domination of the oppressors over the
oppressed. They do not want to justly
address the roots of conflict: in this case,
the unfulfilled right of the Palestinians to
self-determination.

The "peace" these warmongers seek

is chimeric. Just like the "success" of
covert operations in Afghanistan in the
1980s led to September 11, and like the
"success" of I$rael's military and political
moves against the first Palestinian
intifadah led to the current uprising, the
current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq will
lead to future tragedy and war. In their
own long-term interests--to say nothing
of the interests of humynity as a whole--
Amerikans need to break with their
leaders who have proven incapable of

Rai and

Chomsky give

`ten reasons

against war

on Iraq'

This review was written just after U.$.

ground forces invaded Iraq and

published on our website. It remains

relevant, as the Amerikan war-mongers

have turned the deceitful rhetoric they

used against Iraq towards other

countries, such as Syria and North

Korea. For example, there is this lie that

Amerikan military aggression can stop

the spread of "weapons of mass

destruction" ...

War Plan Iraq: Ten Reasons
against War on Iraq
by Milan Rai & Noam Chomsky
London: Verso, 2002, 240pp. pb

his book contains pleas for peace

from 911 victims, photos of

potential Iraqi victims, a chapter

by Noam Chomsky and a thorough

account of the background leading to the

war in 2003. Milan Rai helps us refute a

number of myths being spread by the war-

mongers right now:

1. Myth: there was 12 years time

for diplomacy to work in disarming

Saddam Hussein. Now it's time for

"action."

Fact: The United $tates never backed

disarming Hussein and ordered the end

of UN inspections in 1998 just before they

were going to certify Hussein free of

weapons of mass destruction.

In the whole 12 years, Iraq was under

military occupation with no-fly zones in

the north and the south. Also thanks to

ongoing military action unreasonably

extended, Iraq was not able to trade

without the use of smugglers. Although

most Amerikkkans were not paying

attention to any news at all before 911,

the war in Afghanistan and now Gulf War

II, the military all along said it was in

charge of Iraq's infrastructure. Colonel

John Warden explained how the United

$tates was using humanitarian disaster to

U$ Plans for Palestine

`Road' to Nowhere

Southern Culture

Reviewed

MIM never shies away from

unpleasant tasks, so when debates over

pro-slavery symbols in the Georgia state

flag and the Dixie Chicks grab headlines,

we speak up. Nor is nostalgia for open

white supremacy limited to the South,

as seen in recent comments from Cal.

Republican Bill Back. The lesson

communists take from these incidents

is that "supporting majority rule when

the majority could well be Back or Lott

supporters is unacceptable." We also

review the film Gods and Generals,

aimed at the Civil War reenactment set.

See pages six and seven.

finding a just solution to the problem of
peace and security.

As a public service we review

propaganda guidelines put out by the pro-
I$rael Wexler Analysis (see page nine).
While admitting privately that I$raeli
settlements in Palestine are I$rael's

"Achilles heel,"
the guidelines
aim to place the
blame for the
inevitable failure
of the "road
map" on the
Palestinians.

Continued on page 4...

MIM Notes 282 · May 15, 2003 · Page 2

What is MIM?

The Maoist Internationalist Movement (MIM) is the collection of existing or emerging

Maoist internationalist parties in the English-speaking imperialist countries and their English-

speaking internal semi-colonies, as well as the existing or emerging Maoist Internationalist
parties in Belgium, France and Quebec and the existing or emerging Spanish-speaking
Maoist Internationalist parties of Aztlan, Puerto Rico and other territories of the U.$. Empire.

MIM Notes is the newspaper of MIM. Notas Rojas is the newspaper of the Spanish-speaking
parties or emerging parties of MIM. MIM upholds the revolutionary communist ideology
of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism and is an internationalist organization that works from the

vantage point of the Third World proletariat. MIM struggles to end the oppression of all
groups over other groups: classes, genders, nations. MIM knows this is only possibly by
building public opinion to seize power through armed struggle. Revolution is a reality for

North America as the military becomes over-extended in the government's attempts to
maintain world hegemony. MIM differs from other communist parties on three main
questions: (1) MIM holds that after the proletariat seizes power in socialist revolution, the

potential exists for capitalist restoration under the leadership of a new bourgeoisie within
the communist party itself. In the case of the USSR, the bourgeoisie seized power after the
death of Stalin in 1953; in China, it was after Mao's death and the overthrow of the "Gang

of Four" in 1976. (2) MIM upholds the Chinese Cultural Revolution as the farthest advance
of communism in humyn history. (3) As Marx, Engels and Lenin formulated and MIM has
reiterated through materialist analysis, imperialism extracts super-profits from the Third

World and in part uses this wealth to buy off whole populations of oppressor nation so-
called workers. These so-called workers bought off by imperialism form a new petty-
bourgeoisie called the labor aristocracy. These classes are not the principal vehicles to

advance Maoism within those countries because their standards of living depend on
imperialism. At this time, imperialist super-profits create this situation in the Canada, Quebec,
the United $tates, England, France, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Italy, Switzerland,

Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Israel, Sweden and Denmark. MIM accepts people as
members who agree on these basic principles and accept democratic centralism, the system
of majority rule, on other questions of party line.

"The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should

regard it not as dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of

learning terms and phrases, but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution."

- Mao Zedong, Selected Works, Vol. II, p. 208.

Editor, MC206; Production, MC12

Letters

MIM Notes

The Official Newsletter of The Maoist Internationalist Movement

ISSN 1540-8817

MIM Notes is the bi-weekly newsletter of the Maoist Internationalist Movement. MIM

Notes is the official Party voice; more complete statements are published in our journal,
MIM Theory. Material in MIM Notes is the Party's position unless noted. MIM Notes
accepts submissions and critiques from anyone. The editors reserve the right to edit
submissions unless permission is specifically denied by the author; submissions are
published anonymously unless authors insist on identification (prisoners are never
identified by name). MIM is an underground party that does not publish the names of its
comrades in order to avoid the state surveillance and repression that have historically
been directed at communist parties and anti-imperialist movements. MCs, MIM comrades,
are members of the Party. The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist League (RAIL) is an anti-
imperialist mass organization led by MIM (RCs are RAIL Comrades). MIM's ten-point
program is available to anyone who sends in a SASE.

The paper is free to all prisoners, as long as they write to us every 90 days to confirm

their subsciptions. There are no individual subscriptions for people outside prison.

People who want to receive newspapers should become sponsors and distributors.

Sponsors pay for papers, distributors get them onto the streets, and officers do both
distribution and financial support. Annual cost is: 12 copies (Priority Mail), $120; 25
(Priority Mail), $150; 50 (Priority Mail), $280; 100, $380; 200, $750; 900 (Express
Mail), $3,840; 900 (8-10 days), $2,200. To become a sponor or distributor, send
anonymous money orders payable to "MIM." Send to MIM, attn: Camb. branch, PO Box
400559, Cambridge, MA 02140. Or write mim3@mim.org.

Most back issues of MIM Notes are available free on our web site. The web site con-

tains thousands of documents, with ordering information for many more.

MIM grants explicit permission to copy all or part of this newspaper for any reason, as

long as we are credited.

For general correspondence, contact:

MIM

P.O. Box 29670

Los Angeles, CA 90029-0670

eMail: <mim@mim.org>

WWW: <http//www.etext.info/Politics/MIM>

MIM writes truth
about imperialism and
Iraq

MIM gives us the truth behind U.S.

imperialism and its dynamics. It is true

that anyone who supports the policies in

this country and its jingoism supports the

blood thirsty killers who are bent on totally

colonizing the Middle East to enrich

themselves even more with the Middle

Eastern natural resources. To even

further my statement, it is true that

anyone who perpetuates the economics

of the u.s. thru whatever way receives

blood money. Not only has the Middle

East been colonized but 90 countries have

been invaded by the filth of western

culture. Iraq is to be sucked into the

vacuum of America in this war in Iraq.

What is amazing to me is that there is

not one Muslim in this country even

attempting to at least protest this war. It

seems there are more whites protesting

the war in Iraq. A percentage of these

whites protest the war but they support

the decision to have Hussein removed

from office by the U.S. when the U.S.

has no business trying to dictate to anyone

but themselves. Domestic problems of this

country have not been addressed but yet

the taxpayer's money is going towards

this war in Iraq.

Another issue that is disturbing is the

Arab countries in the Middle East are

allowing the destruction of Iraq as we

speak. People in the world have their

priorities hideously mixed up. Anyone

with any sense of politics knows that this

war in Iraq is behind oil and Iraq's

geographical location to spy on Iran and

other neighboring Middle Eastern

countries. Organizations like MIM know

the real truth. This disease of the white

predatory political economy that must

create war must do what it does because

murder is a dynamic of the capitalist

system. Thanks to your organization's

publication we are kept abreast of those

facts.

-- A prisoner in California,

April 2003

MIM responds: We have seen many

Muslim individuals and organizations on

the streets protesting the war in Iraq.

Many Arab Muslims in particular

correctly tie this war to the situation in

Palestine where Amerika finances

genocidal colonialism by Israel. And by

making these ties they push the anti-war

movement to a broader understanding of

imperialism.

Aside from the anti-imperialists who

have led the anti-war organizing, the anti-

war movement has a liberal pacifist

character. This keeps it from addressing

the colonization of internal (and external)

oppressed nations--and in that sense, the

anti-war movement is indeed white and

held up by its compulsion to appeal to

middle Amerika. Spokespeople for the

liberal "anti-war" majority have ruthlessly

criticized the radical minority for failing

to reach out to the chauvinist white

majority--yet it's the anti-imperialist

minority that's actually accomplished

something. More proof that political line

and umph are what counts, not mere

numbers.

How does Uncle $am
spell relief?

Well, the U.$. has finally invaded Iraq

and as we know a win will guarantee a

long term oil supply for the capitalists'

economy. It's not only for profit but also

control as to foreign policy and oil

companies here in the u$. The capitalistic

government knows that Saudi Arabia will

begin to use its resources as influence

since they are the biggest exporters from

this oil rich region. So instead of seeing a

repeat of the oil embargo of 1973, the

capitalists jump on the chance to make

billions of dollars for Texaco, Chevron and

Exxon Mobil by waging war and give the

people the impression that they are

deposing a tyrant with weapons of mass

destruction and penchant for violence.

Also the stolen petroleum will help rebuild

the country it bombarded with its own

weapons of destruction.

--a New York prisoner March 2003

Keep up the good
work!

Dear MIM,

Greetings to all. First and foremost,

thank you for MIM Notes and the RAIL

website. These are sources of

information vital to the struggles around

the world and here in Amerika. With

today's mass media being the center of

censorship, it's nice to have REAL news!

Being an avid reader of MIM Notes, and

being somewhat of a writer myself, I have

written some poetry inspired from reading

MIM [printed on page 6]. I am not entirely

sure about your policies on submissions,

but I thought I would write and send you

these poems anyway. I have noticed a

few printed by you from prisoners in the

last few issues, I thought I would pass

them on. Delete them, print them, or

critisize them, I don't mind. I thank you

for your time, and your efforts. Your a

wealth of information, and I will continue

to read MIM and RAIL always.

Thank you,

--an Internet reader

MIM Responds: We welcome

submissions of news articles, short poetry

and artwork. Guidelines for news

submissions can be found at http://

www.etext.info/Politics/MIM/faq/

mnstyle.html. Ideas for artistic

submissions are also available: http://

www.etext.info/Politics/MIM/art/

frustart.html.

MIM Notes 282 · May 15, 2003 · Page 3

Table 1. Summary statistics: April 2003 vs. April 2002

Statistic

April, 2002

April, 2003

% change

Number of different MIM web page files actively chosen from 3,784

3,436

-9

Avg. MIM pages served per day

1,977

3,735*

MIM data transferred

99 Mb/day

214 Mb/day

114

Number of different computers MIM served

22,875

51,029*

123

Amazon visitors sent from web page

213

677

218

Number of Art page users

Unknown

6,355

N/A

MIM Notes printed copies compared with pre-911

211

MIM prison circulation averaged over two months Jan 2002

112

*This report excludes all art, and most robots and developer hits for 2003 but not 2002

Table 2. Web traffic: March vs. April, 2003

Department

Mar-03

Apr-03

% chnge

Agitation

2,145

7,209

236

Bookstore

5,342

10,764

102

Albany

104

Chinese

787

1,204

Russian

135

FAQ

4,084

5,674

Classic quotes

564

763

New York City

Movies

1,482

1,995

Turkish

Contemporary controversies/countries page

842

1,088

What is MIM?

4,089

5,089

California

883

1,062

Black Panther page

4,303

5,101

Notas Rojas

1,127

1,318

Study packs

103

118

French

975

1,103

MIM Theory

2,882

3,240

Maoist Sojourner

223

248

German

207

230

MIM Notes

5,614

6,213

RAIL

2,350

2,570

Finnish

166

168

RAIL fliers (within RAIL page)

603

562

-7

Art

7,369

6,355

-14

April, 2003 Central Task Report

by PIRAO Chief, May 1, 2003

Again, thanks in part to the heroic

struggle of the Iraqi people against

imperialist invaders, April was a big

breakthrough month for the web page and

MIM Notes distribution. It's difficult to

celebrate when we know that much of

the interest in our web page arose from

the brutality of the war on Iraq and when

we also know we did not succeed in

stopping the terrorism of our government.

We did not maintain the blistering pace

of the first few days of April, because

the population largely concluded that the

"war is over." Attention dropped off and

then resumed at a higher and steadier

level toward the end of the month. For

MIM, the brightest spot is the

improvement of our agitation numbers

from low levels. Especially in the past

year, we seemed to be attracting people

more and more consistently for historical

and theoretical purposes. People were

reading more material and deepening

their understanding of MIM. Now we

have a "widening" trend going on with a

large influx of people looking at our web

page.

In this report we compare March with

April. We have to remember that March

has one more day than April and thus we

expect our monthly totals of people visiting

a web page to be lower if a department

merely stagnated. If number of visitors

only shrunk 3% over March in a

department, then the department was

stagnant, not actually shrinking on a per

day traffic basis.

This month, the Black Panther page,

MIM Notes 1-250 and the arts page each

had more hits than the home page. The

above table counts the languages all the

same way, based on number of visitors.

It reveals that Spanish is now language

MIM media keep growing

number two, Chinese third and French

fourth for our web page.

Of note on the agitation page, the first

article listed was not the most popular.

The most popular new April article was

"Amerikkkans: The Redcoats of the 21st

Century" with 503 hits.

We expect May will be another big

month for MIM. We are also working

again this year to see what we can do to

avoid the summer slump we usually see.

At the current pace of growth, MIM

would achieve the suggested Five Year

Plan for web page growth in less than

three years. If there are a number of

wars going on, perhaps MIM would

achieve the goal sooner. There are both

external factors beyond our control and

internal factors within our grasp. MIM

has never had a better understanding of

what it is that increases our web page

traffic. There is continuous demand for

our documents. Although at some points

in our history we have had trouble giving

out papers and articles fast enough, we

are definitely now in a position where we

cannot write material fast enough or find

enough money to get the material out

there.

On February 24 about 150 students

from the California State University

system's 23 universities rallied on the

steps of the capitol in Sacramento

protesting increased student fees. There

has already been a 10% increase in fees

this year and Davis has proposed

increasing them by another 25%.(1)

As MIM Notes reported recently,

Davis announced sweeping budget cuts

in January in response to a huge budget

deficit. However, after cutting funds from

nearly everything in the state, Davis

announced a proposed 1% budget

increase for the Department of

Corrections. Davis has accepted more

than $3 million in campaign contributions

from the prison guards' union, so it is no

surprise Davis wants to increase funding

for the powerful union. Contrast this

increase to his proposed reduction in

spending on education: a 4.2% decrease

for the University of California and a

4.5% decrease for California State

University.(2)

On March 1 MIM and RAIL attended

a conference on social justice for social

workers at Cal State Sacramento to

collect signatures to shut down the SHU

(Security Housing Units) control units in

California prisons, at the invitation of one

of the organizers. Several people

connected the issue of Davis' proposed

increase in the prison budget to cuts in

education funding.

The audience was largely supportive

with several attendees working in the

prison system and many people quickly

agreeing to sign the petition and

encouraging their friends to do the same.

Those who challenged us, claiming that

violent prisoners need to be punished and

isolated, were quickly shot down by

arguments from their fellow conference

participants who had worked in prisons

or studied the issue. They pointed out that

the SHU is used to target politically active

prisoners, that California prison guards are

notorious for setting up the violence and

gang fights they claim to be stopping, and

that the SHU only drives prisoners crazy.

The Third World Forum, a publication

by students at UC Davis, provides useful

information on a connection between the

prison and education issues: "The UC

employed Lehman Brothers, a Wall Street

investment bank that has become the

major financial backer of the U.S. prison

industry, to sell $196 million of bonds in

1999, $132 million in 2001, and $45 million

in 2002. This makes the UC one of

Lehman's biggest clients. Lehman made

a profit of approximately $2 million from

those deals. That is profit that was made

from capital which mostly came from

OUR student fees. A movement calling

for the UC to divest from it's stake in

Lehman is already underway.... This fight

is not impossible, recent history has taught

us that the University can be forced to

put People over profits when it was forced

to have Sodexho divest it's 10% state in

Corrections Corporation of America."(3)

This refers to the victory in 2000 when a

student movement on 60 campuses

forced campus caterer Sodexho-Marriott

Services to sell its leading stake in CCA.

MIM calls on education and prison

activists to connect these issues and join

us in the fight against the criminal injustice

system. Since 1984 California has built

21 prisons and only one public university.

The state ranks #1 in prison spending and

#43 in spending on public education.(3)

In California and across the country

Amerika is imprisoning more and more

Black and Latino youth while cutting

educational opportunities. To get involved

in the fight check out the latest news and

actions at http://www.etext.info/Politics/

MIM/agitation/prisons

Notes:
1. The State Hornet, CSU Sacramento, Feb 26,
2003.
2. MIM Notes #275, Feb 1, 2003
3. Third World Forum, Vol 24 #2, Feb. 2003.

California slashes education

budget, boosts prisons spending

MIM Notes 282 · May 15, 2003 · Page 4

shape Saddam Hussein's behavior:

"`Saddam, when you agree to do these

things, we will allow people to come in

and fix your electricity.'"(p. 139) The war

in Iraq never ended; hence to blame

failure on "diplomacy" as if military

means were not in use the whole time is

misleading.

In March 1997, Bill Clinton's U.$.

Secretary of State Madelaine Albright

said that even if Iraq complied with the

UN resolutions,(p. 47) the United $tates

would not lift economic sanctions against

Iraq, contrary to Paragraph 22 of the UN

Resolution 687 on Iraq. Needless to say

this gave Iraq little reason to cooperate

with UN arms inspectors and Iraq had

no choice but to consider war to end the

sanctions and deter the United $tates,

which clearly indicated that weapons

inspections were secondary to some other

U.$. goal in Iraq.

In 1998, Russia, China and France

asked the United $tates to uphold

Paragraph 22 if Iraq disarmed. On

October 30th, the United $tates said "no"

again.(p. 48) At this time, many (including

U.$. employees) realized that the United

$tates was stabbing the UN in the back,

and trying to force the UN to fail in order

to justify U.$. pursuit of other interests

besides weapons inspections.

In fact, the United $tates was caught

using the weapons inspectors to infiltrate

with a team of CIA spies attempting to

overthrow Saddam Hussein.(pp. 55, 201)

Whatever it was the United $tates was

trying to achieve, it was willing to sacrifice

the weapons inspections to stage a coup

against Saddam Hussein. Of course, Iraq

had no choice but to oppose inspections

that were not inspections.

Twice in 1998, the UNSCOM weapons

inspectors had to all withdraw from Iraq,

because the United $tates told Richard

Butler it was about to attack Iraq. When

Butler withdrew, he did not even tell his

boss--the UN Security Council--and

thus Russia, France, China and England

had no chance to stop the United $tates

from ruining the weapons inspections

process again. After the second time and

U.$. bombing of Iraq, the UN weapons

inspectors did not return. Richard Butler

temporarily covered up for the United

$tates by making up some lame excuses

for why the inspections had failed. Russia

and China exposed Butler to the whole

world in the UN Security Council in 1998

as U.$. bombing was going on. By his

own admission, when the United $tates

attacked, Butler was 6 to 8 weeks away

from completing all inspections and

certifying Iraq free of weapons of mass

destruction.

A US intelligence officer admitted in

February 2002 that the U.$. strategy was

"not to take yes for an answer" from

Iraq.(p. 61) Finally in April, 2002, Bush

and Blair held a press conference in the

open where they said "regime change"

was their goal. In such a circumstance, it

is useful for the imperialists to pretend

the weapons inspections failed when they

did. They can then justify "regime

change."

As we go to press, it's been over a week

of war, but the U.S. Government failed

to meet one of its stated objectives.

Planners had said they would have 48

hours to get Saddam Hussein before his

deployments of weapons of mass

destruction took place.(p. 161)

2. Myth: France stabbed the United

$tates in the back.

Fact: Going back several years, France

voted to enforce the existing UN

resolutions consistently, along with Russia

and China and occasionally England. The

French vote against war is consistent with

its earlier stances, the United Nations

charter and the relevant UN resolutions

on Iraq.

The United $tates did not want to allow

Iraq to resume oil exports or allow

weapons inspections to succeed, so there

was no way for the United $tates to vote

along with the other members of the

Security Council. Those members of the

Security Council wanted the original UN

resolution enforced but were unable to

enforce it, because the United $tates and

England had veto power. It is now a

matter of public record that the United

$tates all along had another agenda

besides enforcing UN resolutions.

3. Myth: Democrats would not have

carried out this war.

Facts: Bill Clinton was the one in charge

when the United $tates intentionally

sabotaged UN resolutions on Iraq

including Paragraph 22 of Resolution 687.

He also carried out military operation

"Desert Fox" against Iraq and attempted

a coup against Saddam Hussein by using

weapons inspectors for purposes other

than those declared by the UN. The

"Desert Fox" bombing in December, 1998

was against international law even

according to a one-time British Minister

of "Defence," Lord Healey.(p. 145)

Clinton's bombing of Iraq ended UN

weapons inspections until just before the

2003 war. As Colin Powell correctly

stated, the goal of "regime change" really

started under Clinton: "`We have had a

policy of regime change, which really has

been there all along but was crystallized

by President Clinton in 1998 at the time

of Desert Fox."(p. 75)

Under Clinton, there was also the 23

Tomahawk cruise missiles launched

against Iraq for a faked bomb plot against

Bush Sr. in 1993.(p. 132)

4. Myth: The Labour Party's soul

is against the war, so Blair cannot win

a vote by using democratic methods.

Facts: A March 2002 survey showed

that Labour Party supporters had higher

percentages in favor of war than either

the Conservatives or the Liberal-

Democrats. Labour and Conservatives

were essentially equal in their support of

the war.(p. 167)

Milan Rai said in 2002, "hence Mr.

Blair's decision not to put the invasion of

Iraq to a vote of the House of Commons.

The Prime Minister is determined to

launch what US hawks call a `war for

democracy' in Iraq by undemocratic

methods."(p. 7)

In 2003, we see that Milan Rai was

wrong: Blair did hold a vote and he won

it despite a defection of a minority of his

party. If the Labour Party were so

concerned, it could have removed Blair

in 2002, never mind 2003. True, the

Labour Party felt that this issue deserved

more discussion than any other issue in

recent decades, but in the end, it voiced

some qualms but went along with the

prime minister and Bush.

Milan Rai correctly pointed out that

Blair had a self-interest in making more

ridiculous claims than Bush did, because

Blair had more of a public opinion poll

gap to make up.(p. 118) All along, Blair

correctly perceived which way the public

would go. Once at war, 54% of the public

swung around to support him, up from

36%.(1) Blair had said about previous

polls in April 2002: "`It's hardly surprising

frankly if people are concerned about

military action at this present time because

we are not suggesting it at this present

time.'"(p. 165)

The reason for all this is that the peace

movement has too many bourgeois

democratic prejudices to be able to

understand the true nature of the power

struggle going on. That is why Blair won

it. Even if England eventually retreats

under repeated blows, the fact remains

that the English peace movement was too

weak to stop Blair's throwing the dice,

and taking a chance with the whole

world's survival.

On the question of "democracy," the