Return-Path: <@JHUVM.HCF.JHU.EDU:roper@CSF.COLORADO.EDU> Received: from JHUVM (NJE origin JHUSMTP@JHUVM) by JHUVM.HCF.JHU.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1447; Wed, 15 Sep 1993 14:21:49 -0400 Received: from csf.Colorado.EDU by JHUVM.HCF.JHU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Wed, 15 Sep 93 14:21:47 EDT Received: from localhost (roper@localhost) by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.5/8.5/CNS1.0) id MAA05750; Wed, 15 Sep 1993 12:22:22 -0600 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1993 12:22:22 -0600 From: Don Roper 303-492-7466 Message-Id: <199309151822.MAA05750@csf.Colorado.EDU> To: CHRISCD@JHUVM.HCF.JHU.EDU In-reply-to: chris's message of Wed, 15 Sep 93 12:44:06 EDT <199309151647.KAA05280@csf.Colorado.EDU> Subject: postscript & Lotus archiving Date: Wed, 15 Sep 93 12:44:06 EDT From: chris Don, you forgot to tell the editors the advantages of postscript. i.e. graphics, harder to plagiarize, etc. have you heard about a program that converts Wordperfect or Word files into ascii files and then converts them back to the original. that would solve a lot of problems. for now i am going to have my authors prepare ascii files and send graphics in hard copy to people who request them. chris I did mention graphics and the plagiarization, I dunno. People can always scan finished copy and get it back in electronic form. But certainly it slows it down. When you convert WP binary files to ascii, you lose the formatting codes. Actually WP will save to ascii and then read the ascii, but formatting will be gone. don