From: IN%"bfree@mainelink.net" After Polygamy Was Made A Sin: The Social History of Christian Polygamy John Cairncross, 1974 Published by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London "Orthodoxy in Western Europe, or for that matter in the Christian world as a whole, has been fiercely opposed to polygamy in any shape or form since at least A.D.600, and has shown itself particularly ruthless in suppressing the hated monster whenever it raised its head in their own ranks. This constant opposition explains both why the Christian polygamists rarely put their views into practice and why their writings are often to be found in scarce, or out -of-the-way editions." PREFACE With this introduction, Mr. Cairncross launches into a very scholarly, thoroughly researched, exposition on Christian polygamy, as can be attested to by the Bibliography of more than 90 references, some dating back as far as the 16th century. Ostensibly, Mr. Cairncross is a historian, merely laying out the (albeit fascinating) account of a suprisingly large number of arguments made in favor of, and even attempts to introduce, polygamy, in the Protestant world, some by well known theologians or authors. But to this, admittedly unbiased, reviewer, within the overview of centuries of debate on this issue, it is possible to see a pattern emerging: that of men who truly believe in the righteousness of their cause, willing to take a stand for the Truth, to boldly express that which is often considered Heresy by the powers that be. Some of them would pay the ultimate price for their vision. Their contribution is not lessened, nor their Cause weakened, by the fact that a few who would take up their arguments were merely interested in their own gratification or justification of their dubious lifestyles. Most of those who would pick up this standard were men above reproach. It is no coincidence that this issue was first brought to the fore in Europe, after a silence of many centuries, soon after the beginning of the Protestant Reformation in the early 1500s. It was at this time that men begin to really seek God for themselves, and to take His Word as a personal source of Revelation, once again. What many found there could not be denied: Their was nothing against polygamy in the Bible, and indeed much to suggest it was one type of marriage that God had ordained for his people. "When the great Reformer, Martin Luther nailed his protest against papal indulgences to the church door in Wittenburg in 1517, he started an earthquake. .the Catholic hierarchy was rapidly undermined, and in its place was set the Gospel. .both the Old and New Tes to be literally inspired and deserving of reverence."(pg.2) Thus it was that in 1534, the "German city of Munster proclaimed polygamy as the ideal form of marriage. The event is unique in the history of Christian Europe, and the reaction to this announcement explains why the experiment was never repeated. For it was greeted with a unanimous revulsion and horror."(pg.1) Mr. Cairncross never adequately examines the reason for this opposition, (perhaps because a purely historic look would never be able to discover the true source), but he makes it clear that this opposition was always present (both from the Catholic church, and future Protestant leaders) to meet what ever person or group would dare to propose such a thing. The Munsterites were one radical group of a new Protestant sect, the Anabaptists. Much of the knowledge we have of them, and their year-long polygamist experiment, comes directly from the historians of their enemies, for they were besieged by Catholic and Protestant foes immediately, and when they fell a year late! Some were put to death. The accounts of this time are filled with vitriolic denunciations of the Musterites and their morals, "in fact, Munster under Anabaptist rule was a centre of extremely austere morality. It's only crime, by orthodox standards, was to have introduced polygamy, and a highly Puritan type at that!" (pg .24) While this episode was over quickly, "Puritan polygamy was not extinguished under the ashes of the ruined city. The influence of the Munsterite ideas was profound." (pg.27) So it was that the stage was set for repeated serious forays into the debate on polygamy. A few years later, "Phillip of Hesse felt impelled by his reverence for the sacraments to mend his first marriage by contracting a second one even while his wife was alive. And he did so with the sanction of the Fathers of the Reformation. The first palidin of German Protestantism (Phillip) was, with Luther's and Melanchthon's permission, a bigamist. Protestant historians have never recovered from the shock." (pg. 31) Phillip debated this issue with the Reformer's for many years before and after his (supposedly secret) 2nd marriage. "If, he asked, it should suddenly be possible to overthrow the celibacy of the clergy, why should the institution of bigamy be a priori excluded? The only effective answer would have been that polygamy is condemned by Christian doctrine. But this was a stand that Luther and his colleagues never took - and for very good reasons. They could not. They themselves did not believe that polygamy was against divine or natural law." (pg. 48) Luther did state that "A Christian, before adopting polygamy, must first have a calling from God." (pg. 49) Fair enough. We should all hear from God before daring to any God-ordained true "holy" matrimony. Singular or Plural. The Italian Ochino, a Franciscan until the age of 55, was a fiery orator, and a "man distinguished by the sanctity of his life, of a vast culture, venerable, white-haired, and tall, of a majestic bearing". It was only when Ochino left the Catholic church and "fled to Switzerland where he became a Calvinist that the move towards Anabaptism began". (pg.65- 66) He wrote a brilliant thesis on polygamy that was "effervescent, witty, and convincing." Many of the points contained in this paper are very similar to those found on God's Free Men website. He was eventually exiled for his teachings, along with his four children, during winter 1563, by the City Fathers of Zurich. 3 of his children died as a result. (Chapter IV.) The Christian polygamist story moves eventually to France and England. European life, in many arguments for polygamy, is contrasted unfavorably with that of primitive cultures, and Islamic lands, where it is practiced. Prostitution, divorce early unheard of in these places, but they flourish, and are implicitly approved of, in Europe, where monogamy is the standard. "Between about 1680 and 1750, the campaign for polygamy (in England) was in full swing, and plural marriage was almost as vigorously canvassed as in Germany during the same period." (pg. 126) Milton, author of Paradise Lost, wrote a manuscript in the 1650s, "Da Doctrina", a lengthy theological document. It was lost until 1825, when it was discovered and translated, creating a pre-Victorian uproar in London. The famous author had dared to justify polygamy! His arguments are lucid and concise: " Polygamy is prohibited to no one, even under the gospel." Milton "administers the coup de grace to his opponents when he observed that God himself (in Ezekiel 23:4) represents Himself as having `espoused two wives' which would have been unthinkable had `the practice been dishonourable or shameful'. On the contrary, he maintains, polygamy is `lawful and honourable'." (pg.129) "In England of the 1730s, the disease had turned into an epidemic. Pk dated 1737, an Irish clergyman, polygamy is a doctrine daily defended in common conversation and often in print by a great variety of plausible arguments." (pg.141) Two chapters on the Mormons, and their persecution. " Mormon wives considerable justification, that their conditions of life were far superior to those of the corresponding classes in the counties from which they had come and indeed to those in most parts of America". (pg. 193) A huge home for Mormon polygamous wives, expected to provide a haven for those escaping from their husbands' tyranny, was left without occupants. In the nineteenth century, Protestant missions were expanding rapidly, and missionaries around the globe were confronting polygamy among their new converts. In 1844, a conference of missionaries of various denominations "unanimously agreed that `if a convert, before becoming a Christian, has married more than wives than one, he shall be permitted to keep them all; but such a person shall not be eligible to any office in the church'." (pg.198) An American traveler of this time propagated his polygamous convictions in print in his home country, but chose to remain anonymous. A "Christian Philanthropist", published Philosophy of Marriage, or Polygamy and Monogamy Compared", it ran to a 2nd edition and 1875 and apparently even to a third. " Like almost all of his predecessors, he does not realize that he is part of a long tradition." (pg.198) This work can be found elsewhere on this website. It would appear that there is a common bond between many of these Christian polygamists that cannot be accounted for, since they were often unfamiliar with each other's works. Is it possible that there is a more subtle, more powerful force at work in these men's lives, binding them together in a remarkable quest to restore a Divine plan to our Western society? [Note: The above is also true of the author of this website. All arguments in favor of polygamy found here were first discovered by direct inspection of God's Word - before any of the earlier authors mentioned in this report were ever known to the author of God's Free Men. Only after this truth was first revealed from the Scriptures alone were the confirmations of earlier writers discovered.] Some Christian churches in Africa today allow polygamy. A pastor in Cameroon stated: "People have no right to condemn polygamy which even Christ did not condemn in the case of Abraham". (pg.214) Cairncross sums up "for a long time to come, there will still be an imbalance between the number of men and women able or willing to marry. Which may explain why, even now, some Catholic theologians in Germany are reported to be giving consideration to the possibility of sanctioning polygamy." He closes with a quote from Shaw: "Women will always prefer a tenth share of a first-rate man to the exclusive claim to a third rate one." (pg.218) Reviewed and contributed by: neb